News Agency:News
Why Iran Cannot Be Taken to the Stone Age
Beyond Borders and Bombs: Why Iran Cannot Be Taken to the Stone Age Article written by: H.E. Nassereddin Heidari (Ph.D.) Ambassador of the Islamic Republic of Iran to the kingdom of Thailand April 5 2026
In recent years, political rhetoric from Washington has occasionally reached a fever pitch, with threats to "obliterate" or "bring Iran back to the Stone Age." While such phrases are often intended as displays of military resolve, to the historian, the sociologist, and the Iranian people, they resonate as a profound misunderstanding of what Iran is? To suggest that a "civilizational state" can be bombed into the Stone Age is to ignore five millennia of resilience that have survived far greater catastrophes than modern ordnance. What is a "Civilizational State"? Most Americans view the world through the lens of the nation-state—a concept born in 19th-century Europe where a government rules over a defined territory and a specific ethnic group. Iran, however, fits the rare category of a civilizational state. Unlike a nation-state, a civilizational state (a term also applied to China and India) represents a unique, continuous culture that is older than its current borders or political system. Historical Continuity: Iran’s statehood traces back to the Elamite civilization (3000 BC) and the Achaemenid Empire (550 BC). Cultural Absorption: When Iran was conquered by Alexander the Great, the Mongols, or the early Arab caliphates, it did not disappear. Instead, the "Persianate" culture absorbed its conquerors. The Mongols became patrons of Persian art; the Abbasid Caliphate adopted Persian administration. Intellectual Reach: For centuries, Persian was the "lingua franca" of the intellectual world from the Balkans to India. The "Stone Age" Fallacy: Why It Can’t Be Applied When a leader threatens to return a country to the "Stone Age," they imply that a nation’s value and existence are tied strictly to its modern infrastructure. Iran’s essence is found in a "civilizational DNA" that has survived the total collapse of empires. Resilience through Institutional Memory Iran’s "infrastructure" includes a deep social and intellectual tradition that predates the United States by thousands of years. Iranians are the descendants of the people who invented the first postal system (the Royal Road), the first human rights charter (the Cyrus Cylinder), and advanced irrigation systems (Qanats) that still function in the desert today. You cannot bomb the knowledge of how to organize a society or the collective memory of people who have already survived the "end of the world" multiple times in their history. A Decentralized Cultural Identity A nation-state might collapse if its capital falls. A civilizational state is different; its identity is woven into the very language, poetry, and philosophy of its people. Whether under a Shah, a Sultan, or a Grand Ayatollah, the Iranian identity—celebrating Nowruz (the New Year) or reciting the Shahnameh (the Book of Kings)—remains the bedrock. The Counter-Productive Nature of Insult To an Iranian, being told they will be sent to the "Stone Age" is not just a military threat; it is a profound insult to their contribution to human progress. Iranians view themselves as the pioneers of medicine (Avicenna), mathematics (Al-Khwarizmi), and algebra. Threatening to "decivilize" a people who consider themselves one of the world's primary "donor cultures" only serves to unite them against an external aggressor. 4.The Resilience of a Civilizational State: Why Rhetoric of Ruin Fails Against Iran Recent political threats to "return Iran to the Stone Age" are more than just hyperbole; they are symptoms of a strategic frustration. This rhetoric stems from the fact that despite decades of sanctions, Instead, it has utilized its "civilizational genius" to create a military reality that defies conventional expectations. Military Ingenuity as a Civilizational Product The frustration in Washington often arises from a technological paradox. While Iran prevented to possess the 5th-generation fighter jets that the U.S.  and Israel use to dominate the skies, it has not left its airspace or interests undefended. Asymmetric Brilliance: Drawing from a deep history of mathematical and engineering excellence, Iran has developed precision-guided missiles and advanced drone technology. Challenging Superpowers: This indigenous technology has managed to frustrate the strategic plans of the world’s most powerful militaries. It is this refusal to submit—this "civilizational resistance"—that leads to outbursts of anger from leaders who expected a swift collapse. Furthermore, this defiance is not limited to the military elite; the Iranian people across every city and province stand in 24/7 support of this national defense, viewing their technological self-sufficiency as a matter of civilizational honor. It is this refusal to submit—this "civilizational resistance"—that leads to outbursts of anger from leaders who expected a swift collapse. From Frustration to Insult The "Stone Age" comment is a byproduct of failed scenarios. When the strategy of maximum pressure failed to dismantle the Iranian state, the rhetoric shifted to personal and national insults. However, history records that a state rooted in five millennia of continuity cannot be treated like a temporary political entity. While weapons may destroy buildings, they cannot erase the ingenuity that allows a nation to innovate under siege. The "Civilizational State" of Iran has outlasted countless empires, and it remains a force that cannot be subdued by threats, as its survival is woven into the very fabric of history and its nation.   A Shared Future, not a Ruined Past The American public deserves a foreign policy based on reality, not hyperbole. Iran is a complex modern civilizational state with more than 85 million people, a high literacy rate, and a sophisticated scientific community. Using the "Stone Age" trope ignores the fact that Iran was a center of global civilization when the ancestors of most Westerners were living in tribal settlements. To solve the very real political tensions between Washington and Tehran, we must first acknowledge that we are dealing with a civilization that views itself in terms of millennia, not election cycles. Insulting a nation’s history does not make it more complaint; it only ensures that the "civilizational state" will do what it has always done: endure, resist, and eventually outlast those who seek its ruin.
© 2019 - economy@mfa.ir